Lost defense contracts when CMMC enforcement ramps
Primes are already requiring suppliers to show a CMMC pathway. "We're working on it" loses the next bid.
For defense contractors and subcontractors carrying DFARS and CMMC flow-downs. Train the people who touch CUI on NIST SP 800-171 as it applies to your systems, and give your ISMS a document control and evidence trail an assessor can follow.
Primes are already requiring suppliers to show a CMMC pathway. "We're working on it" loses the next bid.
C3PAOs aren't ISO 9001 registrars. They're harder, more expensive, and rare. A failed assessment burns 6+ months and full reassessment fees.
The two artifacts the assessor opens first. Generic templates fail. Your SSP has to reflect your actual environment and your POA&M has to reflect actual gap closure.
One engineer emailing a CAD file to a personal Gmail account. One marked-up drawing in an unencrypted shared drive. One contract terminated.
Thirty days after rollout, this is what changes.
Every course is adapted to your procedures and your examples before your team sees it. One course for one team, or a program across roles and sites. Neither requires buying the full platform.
Build and run an ISMS: scope, risk assessment, Statement of Applicability, internal audit, management review. The same system we run ourselves and hold a certificate for.
See the course catalog ↗The 110 controls as your team will meet them: CUI identification, access control, incident response, the SSP and POA&M as living documents. Ask on the demo for the current state and timing.
See the course catalog ↗Course availability, learner group and customization scope are confirmed before purchase. Standards references identify the subject matter, not endorsement by the standards owner.
Policies, procedures and evidence are most of an assessment. These workflows keep them controlled, current and attributable.
Draft, redline, route, release. Every revision numbered and immutable. Questions are answered only from your released documents, with the number, the revision, and who signed it. A withdrawn revision cannot be cited by any route.
Plans the audit, carries the checklist and the turtle, and drafts AS9101-style findings from the evidence you record. The report issues when the lead auditor signs it, and not before.
People by competency. Every cell clicks through to its certificate, its date, and its expiry. Gaps and lapses surface before the auditor finds them.
NCR, CAR, SCAR, objectives, suppliers, licenses. One ledger, append-only, every disposition signed by a named person with a date.
Workflows are scoped per engagement. See all eight on the homepage ↗
Every course and every workflow was written by practitioners who have sat on both sides of the registrar's table: third-party AS9100 and ISO 9001 auditing, 20 years of aerospace quality, and the consulting engagements that came after the findings.
No training does. Certification comes from a C3PAO assessment against your implemented controls. This gets the people who own those controls ready to operate them and to evidence them.
Most suppliers are landing at Level 2 and that is where the content is aimed. Level 1 is a subset. Level 3 is a delta on top; raise it on the demo if it is your primary need.
QMS Learning holds ISO 27001 certification and has mapped its controls to NIST SP 800-171. Ask for the certificate and the Statement of Applicability. Send your security questionnaire and we will answer it.
Train to Level 2. Level 1 is included in it, and waiting for the letter costs you the months the controls take to bed in.
Thirty minutes. We look at where your controls and documents actually stand and scope the pathway to the people who own them.
Book a 30 minute demo ↗