A private AI workspace that holds document control, the internal audit programme, corrective action and competence records on one surface. It drafts against the clause, cites the released document it drew from, and files the result as a controlled record. Your documents never train a model and are never visible outside your company.
You see the document control trail, the audit programme and the evidence export first. Then you decide whether it belongs in your building.
Every one of these is live today. Every one files a record you can hand to an auditor.
The AI reads. A rules engine decides. That split is what makes the output defensible evidence instead of an opinion.
Drop in the whole receiving package. It classifies 17 document types, runs about 40 checks, validates the CAGE code against SAM.gov, tests the source against your own approved supplier list, and cites every finding to the standard and to your customer's flow-down.
It reads the paperwork, not the parts. The review that ate an afternoon takes minutes, and a named human still signs the disposition.
Attach the drawing and ask. It balloons every accountable characteristic per AS9102 Rev C and drafts the forms into a numbered record.
You do not fill out a form. You ask, and the first article builds itself.
Check your first article before your customer does. Including the characteristic count mismatch that bounces most packages.
Catch the rejection at your desk instead of at theirs.
Screens a party against the U.S. Consolidated Screening List, walks the ITAR and EAR fork, and files the determination once a qualified person signs.
It never clears a party on its own. A named human signs, and the record proves it.
Procedures, audit plans, corrective actions, management review packs, system security plans, job hazard analyses, end user statements.
Drafted against the standard you hold, in your language.
Every morning it hands you what needs you today. Reviews due, acknowledgments unsigned, findings about to breach, training about to expire.
Thirty seconds instead of twenty minutes of digging.
The second time is always faster than the first, because the system already knows the answer and who signed it.
You ask how your organisation handles nonconforming output. It answers from your released procedure, quotes the clause, and names the revision it read.
You withdraw that revision on Friday. On Monday the same question comes back answered from the new one, and the withdrawn text is gone from memory entirely. It cannot cite a document you retired.
The certificate on the wall says the system existed on audit week. It does not say it ran the other fifty-one.
You do not have a documentation problem. You have a system that only wakes up when a registrar books a date.
We do not sell courses and we do not sell software. We install the capability in your team and it stays there.
A quality manual copied from a template and edited until it passed, then left alone for three years.
Procedures drafted against the clause you actually hold, in your language, and revised as a controlled change with an approver and a date.
Obsolete revisions living on in a shared drive because withdrawal is a manual chore.
A superseded document is evicted from the system's memory the moment it is withdrawn, so it cannot be cited back to you by any path.
An internal audit programme that exists as a plan and not as a habit.
A scheduled programme that opens the audit, walks the process, and drafts the report with findings written against the clause.
Corrective actions closed on the strength of somebody saying it is handled.
Closure gated on the evidence being present, including the training records that prove the fix reached the people doing the work.
Competence evidence assembled by hand the week the auditor lands.
A training matrix where every cell clicks through to the record behind it, exported in one file.
Hold the standard or want the standard. Either way the work is the same work.
Not a general purpose AI tool with a compliance label stuck on the front.
I have written the corrective action, and I have been the one who rejected it. That is the difference between a tool that sounds right and one that survives contact with an auditor.
Omie Trikha, founder, QMS Leader
Nearly two decades implementing and auditing quality systems for aerospace, defense, and manufacturing. Every play in it came off a real floor.
Built on a commercial AI agreement that contractually bars the provider from training on your data. Not a setting somebody has to remember to switch off.
AS9100D, ISO 9001, ISO 13485, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, IATF 16949, ISO 27001, CMMC and NIST 800-171, ITAR, FDA 21 CFR 820, OSHA.
The dashboard and the evidence package were built for the person who has to hand something to a registrar, not for a marketing page.
Everything below is included. Nothing below is an upsell.
This is the first question every quality director asks, so it gets answered before you book anything. Send your security questionnaire ahead of the demo and we will return it completed, line by line.
Bring a finding you had to close and the procedure you closed it against. We put both through the platform live and you judge the output on your own paperwork.