Reliance publishes more than forty ready-to-use applications that you choose, configure and maintain. That is real capability, and it is also a project. Here you say what you need, it does the work, and it files the evidence as a controlled record.
Note on the name: the product is now published as Octave Reliance, following the separation of Hexagon's software business completed in May 2026. Both names are still in circulation.
Every one of these is live today. Every one files a record you can hand to an auditor.
The AI reads. A rules engine decides. That split is what makes the output defensible evidence instead of an opinion.
Drop in the whole receiving package. It classifies 17 document types, runs about 40 checks, validates the CAGE code against SAM.gov, tests the source against your own approved supplier list, and cites every finding to the standard and to your customer's flow-down.
It reads the paperwork, not the parts. The review that ate an afternoon takes minutes, and a named human still signs the disposition.
Attach the drawing and ask. It balloons every accountable characteristic per AS9102 Rev C and drafts the forms into a numbered record.
You do not fill out a form. You ask, and the first article builds itself.
Check your first article before your customer does. Including the characteristic count mismatch that bounces most packages.
Catch the rejection at your desk instead of at theirs.
Screens a party against the U.S. Consolidated Screening List, walks the ITAR and EAR fork, and files the determination once a qualified person signs.
It never clears a party on its own. A named human signs, and the record proves it.
Procedures, audit plans, corrective actions, management review packs, system security plans, job hazard analyses, end user statements.
Drafted against the standard you hold, in your language.
Every morning it hands you what needs you today. Reviews due, acknowledgments unsigned, findings about to breach, training about to expire.
Thirty seconds instead of twenty minutes of digging.
The second time is always faster than the first, because the system already knows the answer and who signed it.
You ask for a management review pack. It queries your live registers, assembles the pack, and drafts the review decisions as tracked action records.
Next cycle those actions come back as inputs, already linked to what they closed. The loop closes itself, and a named human still signs.
Every application you select is one more thing to scope, configure, validate and keep current.
You do not need more applications. You need the work to get done and the evidence to land by itself.
Every line on the left is what Octave publishes about Reliance. We do not characterise their capability and we do not claim they are slow, because they publish otherwise.
More than forty ready-to-use applications, selected and configured into a workflow-based system.
One surface. You describe the job, it does the work, and the output files itself as a numbered controlled record.
Published FAQ standards are ISO 9001, 21 CFR Part 11, IATF 16949, ISO 27001 and EU Annex 11.
AS9100D and AS9120 addressed directly, alongside ISO 9001, ITAR and EAR, CMMC and NIST 800-171.
Published application list does not include receiving-inspection trace package review.
Seventeen document types read in one pass, cited to the standard and to your customer's flow-down.
Published application list does not include AS9102 first article inspection or export classification.
First article ballooning and review, plus screening against the U.S. Consolidated Screening List with a named human signing the determination.
Pricing is described as subscription-based by users, modules or sites, with no figures published.
No published pricing either. The difference is you see it running on your own paperwork before anyone talks commercials.
If you are running many sites with a dedicated system administrator, a configurable platform is a reasonable choice and we will say so on the call.
Not a general purpose AI tool with a compliance label stuck on the front.
I have written the corrective action, and I have been the one who rejected it. That is the difference between a tool that sounds right and one that survives contact with an auditor.
Omie Trikha, founder, QMS Leader
Nearly two decades implementing and auditing quality systems for aerospace, defense, and manufacturing. Every play in it came off a real floor.
Built on a commercial AI agreement that contractually bars the provider from training on your data. Not a setting somebody has to remember to switch off.
AS9100D, ISO 9001, ISO 13485, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, IATF 16949, ISO 27001, CMMC and NIST 800-171, ITAR, FDA 21 CFR 820, OSHA.
The dashboard and the evidence package were built for the person who has to hand something to a registrar, not for a marketing page.
Everything below is included. Nothing below is an upsell.
This is the first question every quality director asks, so it gets answered before you book anything. Send your security questionnaire ahead of the demo and we will return it completed, line by line.
The one that has been sitting on somebody's desk for a week. We run it live and you judge the verdict against the call you would have made.